Re: Can dependency to "docbook-utils" be made optional? — Thank you for the fixes!

To: nbd@other.debian.org
Subject: Re: Can dependency to "docbook-utils" be made optional? — Thank you for the fixes!
From: Lars Rohwedder <roker@pep-project.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 23:05:44 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 17bccae2-5e7e-4b00-879f-3d57d4778257@pep-project.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ZaeZXU9HZx3IAMvS@pc220518.home.grep.be>
References: <[🔎] 19b8472a-305c-4f23-a985-c5567a10b5df@pep-project.org> <[🔎] ZaeZXU9HZx3IAMvS@pc220518.home.grep.be>


Thank you for all the fixes you made recently!

👍

L.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Can dependency to "docbook-utils" be made optional?
  - From: Lars Rohwedder <roker@pep-project.org>
- Re: Can dependency to "docbook-utils" be made optional?
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH net] nbd: always initialize struct msghdr completely
Next by Date: Feature request: nbd-server serves multiple (autogenerated) files in directory hierarchy
Previous by thread: Re: Can dependency to "docbook-utils" be made optional?
Next by thread: Feature request: nbd-server serves multiple (autogenerated) files in directory hierarchy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread