[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Several Installation Problems



I have just converted my 64 bit Linux computer to Debian 6.0.5/KDE 4.4.5 (retaining the Gnome desktop) and have several problems with which I really need help. Although i have been using Linux since about 1993, I am neither a software nor hardware person, but rather a user. Hence, I would ask the readers forbearance.

I had been using openSUSE for quite a few years, but the v 12 series don't support some of my major computational chemistry software.

I had successfully installed Debian on a separate HD from my openSUSE installation and the first problem involves the grub menu.list (which no longer exists in grub-pc which is used by Debian). The distributions currently in the splash screen are:

openSUSE  (this is 12.2 resulting from an upgrade of 12.1)
Advance options for openSUSE
openSUSE 12.1 (x86_64)
Advance options for openSUSE 12.1 (86_64)
Debian/GNU/Linux (6.0.5)
Advanced options for Debian/GNU/Linux (6.0.5)
Debian/GNU/Linux (6.0.4)
Advanced options for Debian/GNU/Linux (6.0.4)

Now for some reason, even though, I used the Debian 6.0.6 iso DVD for the reinstallation of 6.0.5, because of a very stupid attempt on my part to change the video drivers to nVidia which resulted in a degradation of the monitor resolution and the introduction of a really ugly font). Trial and error showed me that I want to boot into the 6.0.4 version (where that version number came from I don't have the faintest clue) to get the new installation which has the resolution and font that I want. Of course the default is the first entry in the menu list. So, the first question is (finally) how do I change the default order of booting to the one that I want?

Next problem. After I selected the primary master HD for the new installation, the installer only found the one HD and ignored the others on the system. The default fstab is:

# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
# device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
# that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
#
# <file system> <mount point>   <type> <options>       <dump>  <pass>
proc            /proc           proc    defaults        0       0
# / was on /dev/sda1 during installation
UUID=c9ff872d-eec5-46ad-824c-fc6d3de57494 / ext3 errors=remount-ro 0 1
# swap was on /dev/sda5 during installation
UUID=812fdf37-0af0-4b52-8bc2-7e58135fd801 none swap sw 0 0
/dev/scd0       /media/cdrom0   udf,iso9660 user,noauto     0 0
/dev/fd0        /media/floppy0  auto    rw,user,noauto  0       0

However, according to fdisk -l I have:


Disk /dev/sda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0008c38c

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *           1       13997   112429056   83  Linux
/dev/sda2           13998       14594     4789249    5  Extended
/dev/sda5           13998       14594     4789248   82  Linux swap / Solaris

Disk /dev/sdb: 40.0 GB, 40020664320 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 77545 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdb1               1       77545    39082648+  83  Linux

Disk /dev/sdc: 40.0 GB, 40020664320 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4865 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0000c04d

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdc1   *           1        1947    15630336   83  Linux
/dev/sdc2            1947        4866    23450624   83  Linux

Disk /dev/sdd: 250.1 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x000b733b

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sdd1   *           1       29649   238152704   83  Linux
/dev/sdd2           29649       30402     6043649    5  Extended
/dev/sdd5           29649       30402     6043648   82  Linux swap / Solaris

Disk /dev/sde: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0003d403

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sde1               1        2611    20972826   83  Linux
/dev/sde2            2612       60801   467411175   83  Linux

Now, if I hadn't been gun shy before about modifying the OS before, I certainly am now.

My second question is that I would like comments about how I think (dangerous that) I should edit fstab:

The entries that are already there I would leave alone. I did check and there are entries in /dev for the other partitions on the HD's

/dev/sdb1  /sdb1  ext3  defaults  0  2
/dev/sdc1  /sdc1  ext4  defaults  0  2
/dev/sdc2  /sdc2  ext4  defaults  0  2
/dev/sdd1  /sdd1  reiserfs  defaults  0  2
/dev/sdd2  /sdd2  reiserfs  defaults  0  2
/dev/sdd5  /sdd5  reiserfs  defaults  0  2
/dev/sde1  /sde1  ext4  defaults  0  2
/dev/sde2  /sde2  ext4  defaults  0  2

I'm particularly not sure about the last two entries on each of the new lines.

With apologies for my long windiness, I will appreciate the help that I'm sure that I'll be receiving.

Thanks in advance.

--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.           Life is a fuzzy set
Foundation for Chemistry           Stochastic and multivariate
www.FoundationForChemistry.com
(614)312-7528 (c)
Skype:  smolnar1


Reply to: