[luther@debian.org: Re: "weird" naming convention for ocamlbuild executables]
----- Forwarded message from Sven Luther <luther@debian.org> -----
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:02:40 +0200
From: Sven Luther <luther@debian.org>
To: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>,
debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: "weird" naming convention for ocamlbuild executables
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:35:35AM +1000, skaller wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 22:08 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> > So if someone step forward and
> > is willing to implement the alternative mechanism which can make
> > ocamlopt (and friends) point to either ocamlopt.byte or ocamlopt.native
> > then please go ahead. I have no objection in shipping that stuff as
> > Debian's ocaml 3.10.0.
>
> You can't do that, it will break things. In Felix at the moment,
> ocamlopt.opt crashes handling dypgen, or, dygen crashes.
> ocamlopt crashes with a Stack overflow message sometimes.
>
> It's quite possible ocamlopt.opt will fail where ocamlopt
> will actually work.
So ? You simply make a call to ocamlopt.byte instead of ocamlopt then,
no ?
Should be a single line change if your build system is well done.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Reply to: