Re: PyEnsembl - how does that help us?
Am 20.05.21 um 20:01 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>
> On 5/20/21 8:38 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
>> Am 20.05.21 um 16:36 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 5/20/21 4:09 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
>>>> Am 20.05.21 um 12:19 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>>>>> On Thu, 20 May, 2021, 3:45 pm Steffen Möller, <steffen_moeller@gmx.de <mailto:steffen_moeller@gmx.de>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 20.05.21 um 11:42 schrieb Andreas Tille:
>>>>> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:00:59AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>>>> >> This can be uploaded to NEW right now, no?
>>>>> > +1
>>>>> My fear was that this would take energies away from finishing the
>>>>> release. But yes, happily so.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think release situation for the med team's end is good.
>>>>> Since you told me and Etienne in the last video conference that your keys expired - do you need sponsoring?
>>>>>
>>>>> If so, mind linking the repos here?
>>>> memoized_property: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-memoized-property
>>>> serializable: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-serializable
>>>> typechecks: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-typechecks
>>>> datacache: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-datacache
>>>> gftparse: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-gtfparse
>>>> pyensembl: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/pyensembl
>>>> xpore: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/xpore
>>> Uploaded: memoized_property, serializable, typechecks, gftparse after some changes, and enabled salsa CI (consider taking a look)
>>>
>>> For xpore: There is a "Suggests: python-xpore-doc" However, there is no such -doc package. The docs look good and should be built. Did you forget to push in any case?
>> I was just sloppy - please remove that suggestion.
> I added a -doc package since building the docs looks good here. However one question: the package vendors two binaries: usr/bin/xpore-dataprep and usr/bin/xpore-diffmod
> Is this a python application or a python library? Or both?
> If it is application, the package needs renaming to simply xpore.
> If it is both, the binaries should go into a different binary package -- thoughts?
Application, after another look at
https://xpore.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html .
Sorry and thanks!
Steffen
Reply to: