[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure



Le vendredi 21 juillet 2023, 10:52:17 UTC Bastien Roucariès a écrit :
> Le vendredi 21 juillet 2023, 08:55:39 UTC Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> > efs
> https://pypi.org/project/qnxmount/ claim to mount it. Check
> > hfs
> https://github.com/0x09/hfsfuse
Corrected not supported by this package may be emulated by using user space hfs tools ?
> > hfaplus
> https://github.com/0x09/hfsfuse
> > qnx6
> Fuse ro filesystem https://pypi.org/project/qnxmount/ better support then kernel one
> > sysv
> no fuse equivalent may be easier to port from (net)?bsd source to fuse or use the method of qnxmount
> > 
> > affs
> no fuse equivalent but a grub filesystem may be ported to fuse
> > ecryptfs
> no fuse equivalent
> > jffs2
> no fuse equivalent
> > jfs
> no fuse equivalent but a grub filesystem may be ported to fuse
> > 
> > And I think that I can also safely add a few more which while actively 
> > maintained I believe are only used in a retrocomputing context or are 
> > generally uncommon anyway:
> > 
> > befs
> A fuse module seems to be avalaible https://www.haiku-os.org/guides/daily-tasks/access_bfs_with_fuse/
> > bfs
> no fuse equivalent
> > hpfs
> no fuse
> > omfs
> https://github.com/bcopeland/omfs_fuse/
> > qnx4
> Maybe Fuse ro filesystem https://pypi.org/project/qnxmount/
> > reiserfs
> so incomplete work using grub filesystem https://github.com/albertz/reiserfs-fuse
> > spu
> This one is a virtual fs for powerpc should be dropped of the list
> > ufs
> https://github.com/mkatiyar/fuse-ufs2
> > 
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: