[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

New slang package available in unstable



Format: 1.5
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 17:53:32 -0500
Source: slang
Binary: slang0.99.34-dev slang0.99.34
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.99.37-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Fearnley <cjf@netaxs.com>
Description: 
 slang0.99.34 - A C programming library for user interfaces - shared library
 slang0.99.34-dev - A C programming library for user interfaces - development kit
Changes: 
 slang (0.99.37-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * upgrade to the latest upstream source
   * I'm trying a packaging experiment:  Since slang 0.99.37 seems to be
     backward compatible with version 0.99.34, I'm going to use the
     same soname as I used in the previous release.  This makes the
     package names weird, but until the upstream supports the standard
     shared library package naming convention it is the best hack I can
     think of.
   * made /usr/doc/slang0.99.34-dev/{changlog.gz,changelog.Debian.gz,copyright}
     symbolic links to /usr/doc/slang0.99.34.
   * made calc, worm, and untic available in the documentation's demo
     directory so that 'for i in calc worm untic; do make $i
     LDFLAGS="-Dunix -DSLANG -lslang -lm"; done' compiles them.
Files: 
 827cdaa223d8906885815e525342e66b 299 devel optional slang_0.99.37-1.dsc
 bd06b7d1aae7333a2aa5e28380440955 323844 devel optional slang_0.99.37.orig.tar.gz
 e6cebdd3d6c42d03e8f5ab3e8815f82a 4745 devel optional slang_0.99.37-1.diff.gz
 08ee133c72ee360d75c90e5356b0fd02 79678 devel optional slang0.99.34_0.99.37-1_i386.deb
 28615f399de81d61dde7a12ec3125bcf 157036 devel optional slang0.99.34-dev_0.99.37-1_i386.deb

-- 
Christopher J. Fearnley            |    Linux/Internet Consulting
cjf@netaxs.com                     |    UNIX SIG Leader at PACS
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf         |    (Philadelphia Area Computer Society)
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf    |    Design Science Revolutionary
"Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller |    Explorer in Universe



Reply to: