On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:54:43AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 08:33:36PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote: > > Matt, if your tree does only contain bugfixes and translations, they > > might be willing to accept a new version after a careful revision of the > > diff. > I could perhaps backport the patch if the release managers feel it is > appropriate, but I'm hesitant to do so in order to fix what seems to be a > cosmetic bug. This message is only displayed for a very brief time, and > does not (in my opinion) detract from apt's usability. > > PS: also, upoading to unstable won't harm anyone, even if it ends up not > > getting into testing. :) > I prefer not to complicate the situation by uploading things to unstable > which are not appropriate for the release, since my understanding is that > testing-proposed-updates is not at 100% yet. I'll accept whatever the > release team says is appropriate, though. Cosmetic bugs are also likely to have low-risk fixes; I would leave it entirely to your discretion whether to upload this change to unstable. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature