Re: New APT

To: Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca>, Deity Creation Team <deity@lists.debian.org>, debian-testing@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: New APT
From: karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom)
Date: 14 May 2000 23:44:53 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k8gwl3bu.fsf@bittersweet.intra>
In-reply-to: Philip Charles's message of "Sun, 14 May 2000 06:43:40 +0000 (GMT)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1000514054331.258A-100000@stephen>

>>>>> "Philip" == Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz> writes:

    Philip> I have previously mentioned that lp, gs, magicfilter & libpaperg
    Philip> are not included either.  We need to ensure that the crass newbie gets
    Philip> everything needed.

 I think that `lprng' should be the one included, since it's the one
 I've had the best luck with.  Anyone else agree?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New APT
  - From: Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz>
- Re: lprng
  - From: Pann McCuaig <pann@ourmanpann.com>

References:
- Re: New APT
  - From: Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz>

Prev by Date: Bug#40006: config which sources to use for upgrade/dist-upgrade or install
Next by Date: Re: New APT
Previous by thread: Re: New APT
Next by thread: Re: New APT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread