[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1064123: libgl1-mesa-dri: latest version crashes X, can't use mouse/keyboard



Control: severity -1 grave

On 2024-02-17 13:35 +0100, Lorenzo Beretta wrote:

> Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
> Version: 24.0.1-1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> after the latest upgrade it's impossible for me to run a display manager
> or startx any window manager; after at most a few seconds / keypresses /
> mouse movements the screen freezes, completely unresponsive to anything
> other than the power button; the log below suggests a null pointer.
>
> Running "sleep 30; killall -u lorenzo" as root before startx returns me
> to a tty.
>
> Reverting to the previous version everything works.
>
> I'm running this on a debian derivative, devuan; afaik it shouldn't make
> a difference, as the package is unmodified from debian - I don't know
> how to verify that other than by installing debian in some partition,
> can one start some window manager from a debian chroot/whatever?
>
> If it's ok in debian or you need any more info please do let me know.

I can reproduce that on my laptop which runs pure Debian, and at least
one other user seems to have the same problem.

> VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus:
> ----------------------------------
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> [AMD/ATI] Oland [Radeon HD 8570 / R5 430 OEM / R7 240/340 / Radeon 520
> OEM] [1002:6611]

I have the following graphics hardware:

,----
| 00:01.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices,
| Inc. [AMD/ATI] Mullins [Radeon R3 Graphics] [1002:985\ 0] (rev 40)
`----

This is also using the radeonsi driver, and the symptoms and the
backtrace are the same as yours.

Bumping severity to keep this mesa version out of testing, but I will
not be able to investigate the problem because I need the machine and
have already downgraded all packages from src:mesa.  There does not seem
to be an upstream report yet.

Cheers,
       Sven


Reply to: