Bug#297609: marked as done (Fluxbox: Mod4 Tab :NextWindow looses 1st keypress)
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:53:19 +0100
with message-id <20050301205319.GA2860@linuxfr.org>
and subject line Bug#297609: Fluxbox: Mod4 Tab :NextWindow looses 1st keypress
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2005 18:29:19 +0000
>From luca@llucax.hn.org Tue Mar 01 10:29:19 2005
Return-path: <luca@llucax.hn.org>
Received: from ol194-92.fibertel.com.ar (burns.springfield.home) [24.232.92.194]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6C7S-0001Rp-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:29:19 -0800
Received: from homero.springfield.home ([10.10.10.2] helo=llucax.hn.org)
by burns with smtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1D6CBJ-00033A-Ax
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 15:33:17 -0300
Received: (nullmailer pid 29777 invoked by uid 1000);
Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:33:20 -0000
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:33:20 -0300
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fluxbox: Mod4 Tab :NextWindow looses 1st keypress
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20050301183320.GA29637@llucax.hn.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Paranoid: Just because you're paranoid, don't mean they're not after you.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: <luca@llucax.hn.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
This is the same problem of bug #261816:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261816
but using Mod4 (Windows Key) instead of Mod1 (Alt) for window switching.
To reproduce it you have to change (or add) to the fluxbox keybinding file
(usually ~/.fluxbox/keys) this:
Mod4 Tab :NextWindow
(and have a keyboard with Windows Key)
Then follow this steps:
1. open 2 xterm's
2. mod4+tab brings another window into focus
3. type
4. notice first keypress doesn't do anything.
The problem seems to be (again) /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/pc/pc file. I attach
a patch based on Xorg's file to fix it.
(I don't know if RCTL-related stuff is necesary)
--
LUCA - Leandro Lucarella - JID: luca(en)lugmen.org.ar - Debian GNU/Linux
.------------------------------------------------------------------------,
\ GPG: 5F5A8D05 // F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05 /
'--------------------------------------------------------------------'
Run, rabbit run.
Dig that hole, forget the sun,
And when at last the work is done
Don't sit down it's time to dig another one.
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pc.patch"
--- /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/pc/pc 2005-03-01 14:56:22.453363400 -0300
+++ pc.new 2005-03-01 15:00:23.326745080 -0300
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@
include "pc/pc(basic)"
key <LALT> { [ Alt_L, Meta_L ] };
key <RALT> { [ Alt_R, Meta_R ] };
+ key <RCTL> { [ Control_R, Multi_key ] };
};
@@ -216,8 +217,10 @@
key <LALT> { [ Alt_L, Meta_L ] };
key <RALT> { [ Alt_R, Meta_R ] };
key <LWIN> { [ Super_L ] };
- key <RWIN> { [ Super_R ] };
+ key <RWIN> { [ Super_R, Multi_key ] };
key <MENU> { [ Menu ] };
+ key <RCTL> { [ Control_R, Multi_key ] };
+ modifier_map Mod4 { Super_L, Super_R };
};
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297609-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2005 20:53:33 +0000
>From barbier@linuxfr.org Tue Mar 01 12:53:33 2005
Return-path: <barbier@linuxfr.org>
Received: from main.uucpssh.org [212.27.33.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6EN2-0007wN-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:53:33 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by main.uucpssh.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C03663D6
for <297609-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:53:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: by main.uucpssh.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 26CB3728AE; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:53:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 94D7124B1E; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:53:19 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:53:19 +0100
To: 297609-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#297609: Fluxbox: Mod4 Tab :NextWindow looses 1st keypress
Message-ID: <20050301205319.GA2860@linuxfr.org>
References: <[🔎] 20050301183320.GA29637@llucax.hn.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050301183320.GA29637@llucax.hn.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: barbier@linuxfr.org (Denis Barbier)
Delivered-To: 297609-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:33:20PM -0300, luca@llucax.hn.org wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
>
> This is the same problem of bug #261816:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261816
> but using Mod4 (Windows Key) instead of Mod1 (Alt) for window switching.
Your bugreport seems to show that fluxbox does not interact gracefully
with XKB, but there is no evidence that XKB has to be patched. You can
achieve the same result with the altwin:super_win option, thus I am
closing this bug. Please read FAQ.xhtml#xkbnewlayout for more
information.
Denis
Reply to: