Re: Question on X and new license...
- To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Question on X and new license...
- From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@saltmine.radix.net>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:53:01 -0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 10465gd2a07jh3b@corp.supernews.com>
- References: <40396807.4000107@realitydiluted.com> <20040223044324.GE697@deadbeast.net> <20040226115919.GC27921@lambda> <20040226195744.GA9196@starless.xtnet> <20040227192609.GL28997@deadbeast.net> <103vmag4okbsq8a@corp.supernews.com> <20040301031945.GA863@deadbeast.net>
Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:57:04PM -0000, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote:
>> > There may not be very many people who want to use the new XFree86
>> > license, just to get along with the XFree86 Project leadership, and who
>> > also want to retain GPL-compatibility, but it's not an unreasonable
>> > position, and dual-licensing would be an easy way to achieve it.
>>=20
>> That's an interesting point. Can you point out anyone in the other mob
>> who's actually a leader?
> I'm sorry, I don't understand the question.
That's obvious (to anyone who's not a member of this angry & unthinking mob).
But I was curious if you could point to someone who would be better than that.
(have a suitable day).
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
Reply to: