Bug#1049395: ITP: rust-ed25519 -- generic Ed25519 signature algorithm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
* Package name : rust-ed25519
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Contact: RustCrypto Developers
* URL : https://github.com/rustcrypto/signatures
* License : Apache-2.0 or Expat
Programming Lang: Rust
Description : generic Ed25519 signature algorithm
ed25519 is a library providing asynchronous, multiplexed tailing
for (namely log) files.
The `ed25519` crate allows you can write code
which signs and verifies messages using the Ed25519 signature algorithm
generically over any supported Ed25519 implementation.
.
This allows consumers of your code
to plug in whatever implementation they want
to use without having to add all potential Ed25519 libraries
you'd like to support as optional dependencies.
.
Ed25519 is an EdDSA signature scheme
using the secure hash function SHA-512 (SHA-2)
and the elliptic curve Curve25519.
This package is needed for safe-network (bug#1008016).
It will be maintained in the collaborative debian section of salsa, at
<https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rust-ed25519>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=aSiD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: