Bug#869169: packaged and uploaded
> Nilson is already working on this package at
https://salsa.debian.org/nilsonfsilva/minisign.
> Is there a reason for creating that repo when you do not own the ITP? Do you
want to sponsor Nilson?
Sorry, I didn't mean to step on anyone's toes. I'd be very happy if Nilson
wants to be the maintainer of the minisign package. We can move the package to
whichever salsa repo he wants. Also, I don't need to be a maintainer of this
package, I maintain enough already. I'm flexible and open on all this, I just
wanted to get minisign into Debian and didn't find signs of progress on the ITP bug.
> A side note: signify-openbsd is already in the archive. This is almost the
same (https://github.com/aperezdc/signify/issues/20). Why should we package
minisign in addition?
signify-openbsd is a different codebase with a different feature set. They are
similar, but far from the same thing.
Reply to: