Bug#694077: Package review
If you go for the patch approach add a Comment field in the copyright
file, so reviewers know what to expect-.
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 12:33, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
<perezmeyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 12:26, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> <perezmeyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > Mmm, I'm not entirely sure if the code in plugins/hid is
> > DFSG-compliant. It's license it's too lax. I think I'll upload it non
> > the less in the meantime, and see what FTP masters think.
>
> Better yet, I looked for previous art within Debian and found:
>
> <http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=HIDAPI_H__&literal=1>
>
> And more specifiically:
>
> <http://codesearch.debian.net/show?file=libsdl2_2.0.9%2Bdfsg1-1%2Fsrc%2Fhidapi%2Fhidapi%2Fhidapi.h&line=27>
>
> As you can see the license is much clearer there. This is something
> that must be solved before uploading. Ideally by fixing it upstream,
> but a patch might do the work in the meantime.
>
> Cheers, Lisandro.
>
> --
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
> http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Reply to: