[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#273316: [Fwd: Re: Beaver Adoption]



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I am letting go of this ITA as the previous maintainer agrees with me
that the package should be let go.

- -- Chris Sacca

- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Beaver Adoption
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:31:59 +0530
From: rkrishnan@symonds.net (Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan)
Organization: Free Software for the Free World
To: Chris Sacca <csacca@thecsl.org>
References: <41FF9E94.5040101@thecsl.org> <86fz0gcjeq.fsf@symonds.net>
<4207C899.8060708@thecsl.org>

~ || On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:59:21 -0500
~ || Chris Sacca <csacca@thecsl.org> wrote:

~ csacca> Well, I made a package of 0.2.7 that's lintian and linda clean.
~ It's
~ csacca> a newer version and has some bug fixes, but I'm not sure if it
should
~ csacca> really be uploaded.  First off, I couldn't get 0.3.1 to
compile for
~ csacca> me, so I wasn't able to make a package closing the GTK2 bug on
beaver.
~ csacca> Secondly, and more importaintly, upstream isn't really alive.

Yes, that was the reason I gave it up. And I don't use beaver too.

~ csacca> I really like beaver, but I don't really have the time ( or
really the
~ csacca> skills ) to maintian the actual code base.  Given that, what
should
~ csacca> happen?

I personally believe, that software which has no upstream maintainership
should
not be in debian, because it will become a maintainance nightmare for
the maintainer.
And there are quite a lot of replacements, so the active usebase will
move on,
rendering the package useless.

~ csacca> My package of beaver 0.2.7 is at
http://csacca.thecsl.org/debian/beaver/
~ csacca> but perhaps beaver should be dropped from debian as no one is
~ csacca> maintaining the code any more.

Yes, that's what I too feel.

- --
~    Ramakrishnan                   http://www.hackGNU.org/
~    Use Free Software -- Help stamp out Software Hoarding!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCD9Xhy0aWpK/4cBMRAgASAKCY8KK7YKvD/MsI2gJOzPSBJhz6YQCeLkl6
wzDVe3HPEqPss7kAZkoUG4A=
=fRuu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: