Bug#178321: ITP: aspell-uk -- The Ukrainian dictionary for GNU Aspell
Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> writes:
> Er... so take it up with the ISO standard?
It's got nothing to do with ISO.
> Having twenty packages named using a standard aspell-<ll>, and one
> package named 'aspell-<cc>' seems more confusing to me, particularly
> if you're a user who *needs* the package in question and
> consequently are likely to know what the language code is.
Again it's not about <ll> vs <cc>; I don't care what is used in place
of "uk" as long as it's not "uk". What exactly is wrong with "ukr"
for instance?
> Are you really suggesting that people are going to look at 'aspell-uk'
> and think "Oh, good, just what I needed, a dictionary of words specific
> to Britain"?
Err, yes. I certainly would. Why on earth wouldn't they? There's
precedent for British dictionaries after all (ibritish).
--
James
Reply to: