Hi, On 17/10/14 at 10:01 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > But designing and tuning alternative proposals might take time, so I > would prefer to wait a few days before reducing the discussion period, > to ensure that we vote with a sensible ballot. I will decide in the > middle of next week about that. I think that the current set of options would be a sensible ballot, and I'm not aware of any discussions to add another option, so I'm inclined to shorten the discussion period. I reached out to Ian in private (in an attempt to limit the noise on this list), but Ian suggested that we have this discussion in public. However, Ian said that he has no objection to shortening the discussion period. Charles, Luca, can you confirm that you are also fine with shortening the discussion period to one week? On the other hand, Ian said that he doesn't think that it would be right to shorten the voting period. Given that I have been heavily involved in the discussions around this GR proposal, I am not going to reduce the voting period against the original proposer's will. Lucas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature