Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5

[Matthew Vernon <matthew@sel.cam.ac.uk>]

Branden Robinson writes:

<Branden's vs Manoj's proposal>

 > His remains a strict superset of mine.  If you feel I am being dishonest, I
 > suggest you perform a diff of the actual texts of the proposed changes,
 > excluding front matter in the mail messages, and the rationales.

I think dishonesty isn't the issue here. It seems that Branden's and
Manoj's proposals have different effects, beyond clarifying the
current situation. Branden's would make it relativly easy to modify
the Social Contract (and other non-technical documents), whereas
Manoj's would make it relativly difficult to modify the "core"
non-technical documents.

Manoj's proposal might textually be a superset of Branden's, but in
intent they are very different.

Matthew

-- 
Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Empire
http://www.pick.ucam.org