Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, skoric@uns.ac.rs
Subject: Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go?
From: skoric@uns.ac.rs
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 18:03:47 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] 60586.127.0.0.1.1706807027.squirrel@127.0.0.1>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20240201164750.0a8dcd37@dorfdsl.de>
References: <59fb7848-8407-7789-9487-f24dfeb4f353@uns.ac.rs> <e6aff7a2-f02d-458e-b7e5-53d6994437a6@home.arpa> <[🔎] 7087d4cf-1647-75cd-9327-36b4791a6f2e@uns.ac.rs> <[🔎] 20240201150320.7e726975@dorfdsl.de> <[🔎] 49419.127.0.0.1.1706801619.squirrel@127.0.0.1> <[🔎] 20240201164750.0a8dcd37@dorfdsl.de>

> Am 01.02.2024 schrieb skoric@uns.ac.rs:
>
>> CPU op-mode(s):                     32-bit, 64-bit
> Model name:                         Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4500
>
> That processor can run amd64 Debian, so install that architecture.
>
>

I am not sure what do you mean by "install that architecture". I have been
using i386 versions of Debian, and I do not plan to reinstall it now just
because the CPU may allow that. So instead, I ask whether it was expected
and properly when Synaptic installed lots of 64-bit stuff during Wine
installation from repo. Was it ok or not? Or shall I remove it and follow
instructions from WineHQ website?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go?
  - From: Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de>

References:
- Wine in bullseye, which way to go?
  - From: Miroslav Skoric <skoric@uns.ac.rs>
- Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go?
  - From: Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de>
- Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go?
  - From: skoric@uns.ac.rs
- Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go?
  - From: Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de>

Prev by Date: printing problem, markdown files
Next by Date: Re: install Kernel and GRUB in chroot.
Previous by thread: Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go?
Next by thread: Re: Wine in bullseye, which way to go?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread