Re: why bookworm isn't called deb12?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: why bookworm isn't called deb12?
From: hlyg <hlyg2023@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 07:39:58 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] SEZPR01MB455270A4BE57DC191B72CB26C52CA@SEZPR01MB4552.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 59d2aa4b-dad1-6e61-54a3-4e3d06b2877b@busby.net>
References: <[🔎] SEZPR01MB4552E7C515D80CC2ED689AF4C52CA@SEZPR01MB4552.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <[🔎] 59d2aa4b-dad1-6e61-54a3-4e3d06b2877b@busby.net>

On 7/7/23 06:42, Bret Busby wrote:

On 7/7/23 04:23, hlyg wrote:
it follows Windows naming style: win7, win8 ...
Of course,if you want compliance with MS Windows, then, perhaps,Linux, and, especially, Debian, might not be appropriate for you...

i have used wrong word, i don't mean that. you know English is my 2ndlanguage. when we learn foreign language, we tend to parrot

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why bookworm isn't called deb12?
  - From: Bret Busby <bret@busby.net>

References:
- why bookworm isn't called deb12?
  - From: hlyg <hlyg2023@outlook.com>
- Re: why bookworm isn't called deb12?
  - From: Bret Busby <bret@busby.net>

Prev by Date: Re: why bookworm isn't called deb12?
Next by Date: Re: why bookworm isn't called deb12?
Previous by thread: Re: why bookworm isn't called deb12?
Next by thread: Re: why bookworm isn't called deb12?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread