[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A hypervisor for a headless server?



Using qemu is out of discussion,because it is very slow. But as I said,bhyve works better than qemu alone.

On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 2:44 PM Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 11:21:45AM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote:
>wait wait. for sure the option should be enabled on the bios,but bhyve works in
>a different way than kvm,so it works even if my cpu does not have all the virt.
>parameters respected. Infact kvm does not work on that cpu. But how many cpus
>there are like mine ? Does Linux feel to cover the gap of an alternative to
>qemu and kvm ? not sure about xen as an alternative. 

kvm is literally the hardware acceleration piece. If your CPU doesn't
support that, use qemu without kvm and you get exactly the same
experience (just a bit slower). So "linux" "feels" no need to cover the
gap, because there isn't one.



--
Mario.

Reply to: