[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT "x times cheaper", was: Re: Server hardware advice.



On 10/08/19 9:10 PM, deloptes wrote:
> Richard Hector wrote:
> 
>> <rant>
>> Sorry, this usage grates with me.
>>
>> $amount cheaper that $price means subtract $amount from $price
>>
>> $x times $price means multiply $price by $x
>>
>> so "2 times cheaper (than $450)" is:
>>
>> $450 - (2 x $450) = -$450.
> 
> so what multiplied  by 2 gives 450? 
> 
> 450     is      100% or 1
> 225     is      50%  or 1/2

Right, so 225 is 50% cheaper, or half cheaper. Not twice cheaper.

> perhaps this is the confusion, cause we are using daily language to refer to
> maths.

Daily language is the problem, yes. I'm not saying my fight is an easy
one :-)

> In fact I would do it the other way around.
> 
> initial price   x
> 1xtime          x+(1*x)
> 2xtimes         x+(2*x)
> 
> this gives x=150

450 is two times more expensive than 150 (or 200% more than), or three
times as expensive as 150 (or 300% as expensive).
300 is two times as expensive as 150, or 100% more expensive than 150

We know that these don't work symmetrically; if you have a 50% discount,
you can't get the original price back by adding 50%, because it's 50% of
a different number.

Richard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: