Re: Document removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster
On 2019-07-01, Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:47:35AM -0000, Curt wrote:
>> Another, less serious, gotcha for those inveterate upgraders and newbies
>> who don't read the release notes is that
>> '/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules' is no longer a valid
>> mechanism for defining device names.
>
> For whatever it's worth, when I upgraded this machine from stretch to
> buster a couple months ago, it continued using eth0 as the interface
> name without any immediately obvious issues. I did the conversion to
> "predictable interface names" anyway, just in case there might be some
> subtle problem that I wasn't yet seeing.
>
>
And you had that device name defined (as I did) in
'/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules' when you upgraded?
Reply to: