On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 07:40:04PM +0300, Reco wrote: > I stand corrected. They (HP) hid it pretty well, though. > I was under impression that they prefer something more enterprisey > there, like SuSE or RHEL. > To complete the analogy with Fedora one needs to count all DDs who are on HPE > payroll, I guess. I am aware of two ex-HP Debian Developers; Bdale Garbee (who I think is probably largely responsible for securing HP's support of Debian) (http://gag.com/bdale/) and Keith Packard (https://keithp.com). For clarity's sake I have absolutely no doubts as to their honesty and integrity. They're both exemplary F/OSS folks IMHO (I've met Keith once and Bdale twice, I think) and of huge value to the project. > A quick search at [1] did not produce anything useful. A search on email domain is never going to be particularly accurate. I don't post from @redhat.com, for example. Instead, if people felt this was a concern, perhaps a process for voluntarily "declaring an interest" could be worked out. I should stress that I have no concerns about anyone I know, but in the interests of transparency I would support the discussion and development of the above. But that ball should probably start rolling on the debian-project list. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature