On 01/02/17 07:11 PM, Roba wrote:
There shouldn't be any problem with ext4. It's been the Linux standard for years now. I can't even imagine what the backup issue would be unless they were trying to make some kind of sparse backup using FS internals.Is there any difference between ext3 and ext4 in terms of backing up a system? I can't recall the details but I run into a backup problem once and remember reading that ext4 was under experimentation by the backup developers and ext3 was supported fully but not ext4. I am not sure if it was clonezilla or not.