Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?
On Friday 16 December 2016 22:40:22 Brian wrote:
> On Fri 16 Dec 2016 at 22:40:01 +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:31:06PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Friday 16 December 2016 21:19:45 Joe wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:55:32 +0000
> > > >
> > > > Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > You have over-cut. Here is what you cut, which is highly relevant:
> > >
> > > "On Friday 16 December 2016 09:58:36 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > > At least in the case of delivery to the SPAM box the mail has been
> > > > > actually delivered to the user.
> > > >
> > > > "Technically", yes.
> > >
> > > No, not just technically. Actually. The recipient then has the choice
> > > whether to ignore it or not."
> >
> > Let's just agree to differ on that.
>
> No, let's just say your "technically" means exactly the same as Lisi's
> "actually". Then there is no need to differ and everybody is happy. :)
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather a scornful tone, "it
means just what I choose it to mean-neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many
different things."
"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master that's all."
:-)
Lisi
Reply to: