Re: Backing up system customization: Is Debian packaging better than Remastersys?
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Backing up system customization: Is Debian packaging better than Remastersys?
- From: Linux-Fan <Ma_Sys.ma@web.de>
- Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 22:35:15 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 510C3513.5040105@web.de>
- In-reply-to: <20130130102935.GC6566@sid.nuvreauspam>
- References: <51053B25.6020106@web.de> <201301271744.36155.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <51056A2A.60402@web.de> <201301271912.40892.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <20130128220203.GC4182@sid.nuvreauspam> <5107A27A.1090102@web.de> <20130130102935.GC6566@sid.nuvreauspam>
On 01/30/2013 11:29 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 29 ian 13, 11:20:42, Linux-Fan wrote:
>> On 01/28/2013 11:02 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>> On Du, 27 ian 13, 19:12:40, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well, for only 4 systems puppet might be a bit off. I´d suggest starting with
>>>> puppet not before at least 10 systems.
>>>
>>> The initial setup is definitely not trivial, but afterwards you sit back
>>> and relax ;)
>>
>> This is also what I expect from Debian packaging: Work once, enjoy later.
>
> While you can certainly (ab)use custom Debian packages for your needs I
> strongly believe in "the right tool for the right job", which I think
> puppet is much closer to.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andrei
The perfect solution would be to use both then: Debian packaging for the
software and Puppet for the configuration. [1] supports this idea, but I
guess that I will "abuse" packaging for the configuration (at least
until I find out that it does not work or is difficult to maintain) in
order not to have to learn two complex systems.
[1]
http://serverfault.com/questions/215545/deploy-our-own-software-using-puppet
Linux-Fan
Reply to: