[Please trim your posts on this mailing list] On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:14:34AM -0400, PMA wrote: > I'm not sure "utterly" is quite the word. > Nobody in signing thinks a signature is > needed to identify him. You're not confusing the cryptographic signature with the normal email signature, are you? -- "Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet." -- Napoleon Bonaparte