Mark Allums wrote :
It still begs some questions. Why don't they build/package a normal
kbuild that matches the dependency that the kernel header package has?
I suppose that it will enter mainstream, instead of being in
kernel-archive, and then there will be a kbuild infrastructure. Maybe
it is too much work for the relatively few people who roll their own
custom kernel. But a lot of people use that NVidia blob. And other
hardware drivers that need compiling.
Mark
I don't know about that, but I just checked with the 2.6.28 which is in
unstable and it doesn't seem to have it's ready made corresponding
kbuild either, at least aptitude didn't find it for me...
Tom