Im not trying to troll but what complications? Regards, Dean. On Sun, 1 Dec 2002 07:30:28 -0800 Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org> wrote:
--- Begin Message ---
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: block webistes "websites"
- From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
- Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 07:30:28 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20021201153028.GE27345@ursine>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 018ad53191501c2DTVMAIL7@smtp.cwctv.net>
- References: <[🔎] 018ad53191501c2DTVMAIL7@smtp.cwctv.net>
(Your mailing habits are somewhat broken. Please turn on your line wraps and don't top post.) On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 03:22:33PM +0000, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote: > you should try a HOSTS file, define 127.0.0.1 as localhost on first > line and type 127.0.0.1 forbiddendomain.com on second, I use mine to > block doubleclick... This is not a good use of the hosts file and could confuse things down the line. A better solution to this would be to do any of the following: 1) Use iptables to deny connections to 80/tcp on undesirable hosts. 2) Use squidgaurd 3) If you're trying to stomp ads, use adzap. http://adzapper.sourceforge.net/ -- .''`. Baloo <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org> : :' : proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a systemAttachment: pgpXTLJcUB9Gb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---