Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2023 22:23:45 +0200 with message-id <fe13f118dc4d275e2f66445aa9fb6091326f912e.camel@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1036891: texlive-binaries: Error "attempt to call method 'read' (a nil value)" makes lualatex unusable has caused the Debian Bug report #1036891, regarding texlive-binaries: Error "attempt to call method 'read' (a nil value)" makes lualatex unusable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1036891: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036891 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: texlive-binaries: Error "attempt to call method 'read' (a nil value)" makes lualatex unusable
- From: Philippe SWARTVAGHER <phil.swart@gmx.fr>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 20:52:21 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 64BD1390-D21B-49F0-96E3-B7CBB5E58FDE@gmx.fr>
Package: texlive-binaries Version: 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, (not sure if this bug report should be against texlive-luatex or texlive-binaries...) I upgraded texlive-binaries (and other related packages) from 2018.20181218.49446-1 to 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1 on a Debian Buster. Since then, I cannot use lualatex because of an error. Here is how to reproduce the problem (I used Docker with `docker run -it debian:buster`): ``` apt update apt install texlive-latex-base texlive-luatex cd cat > test.tex <<EOF \documentclass{article} \begin{document} foo \end{document} EOF lualatex test.tex ``` And I get the following output: ``` This is LuaTeX, Version 1.07.0 (TeX Live 2019/dev/Debian) restricted system commands enabled. (./test.tex LaTeX2e <2018-12-01> ...-dist/tex/luatex/luaotfload/luaotfload-configuration.lua:292: attempt to cal l method 'read' (a nil value) stack traceback: ...-dist/tex/luatex/luaotfload/luaotfload-configuration.lua:292: in function ' task' ...-dist/tex/luatex/luaotfload/luaotfload-configuration.lua:923: in function < ...-dist/tex/luatex/luaotfload/luaotfload-configuration.lua:919> (...tail calls...) ...-dist/tex/luatex/luaotfload/luaotfload-configuration.lua:1030: in function 'init' ...ive/texmf-dist/tex/luatex/luaotfload/luaotfload-main.lua:243: in function ' initialize' ...ive/texmf-dist/tex/luatex/luaotfload/luaotfload-main.lua:284: in function ' main' [\directlua]:1: in main chunk. <everyjob> ...ring \\def\string \\encodingdefault{OT1}')end } \let \f@encoding \encoding... l.1 \documentclass{article} ? ``` Some remarks: - it works as expected with version 2018.20181218.49446-1 (tested by removing buster/updates from sources.list) - it works as expected as long as I don't install texlive-luatex - I didn't test with Debian stable / testing / unstable Thanks, Philippe. -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.13 APT prefers oldstable-updates APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.15.49-linuxkit (SMP w/1 CPU core) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_RANDSTRUCT Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: unable to detect Versions of packages texlive-binaries depends on: ii dpkg 1.19.8 ii libbrotli1 1.0.7-2+deb10u1 ii libc6 2.28-10+deb10u2 ii libcairo2 1.16.0-4+deb10u1 ii libfontconfig1 2.13.1-2 ii libfreetype6 2.9.1-3+deb10u3 ii libgcc1 1:8.3.0-6 ii libgmp10 2:6.1.2+dfsg-4+deb10u1 ii libgraphite2-3 1.3.13-7 ii libgs9 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u7 ii libharfbuzz-icu0 2.3.1-1 ii libharfbuzz0b 2.3.1-1 ii libice6 2:1.0.9-2 ii libicu63 63.1-6+deb10u3 ii libkpathsea6 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1 ii libmpfr6 4.0.2-1 ii libpaper1 1.1.28 ii libpixman-1-0 0.36.0-1+deb10u1 ii libpng16-16 1.6.36-6 ii libpotrace0 1.15-1 ii libptexenc1 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1 ii libsm6 2:1.2.3-1 ii libstdc++6 8.3.0-6 ii libsynctex2 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1 ii libteckit0 2.5.8+ds2-5 ii libtexlua52 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1 ii libtexlua53 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1 ii libtexluajit2 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u1 ii libwoff1 1.0.2-1 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.7-1+deb10u2 ii libxaw7 2:1.0.13-1+b2 ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1+b2 ii libxi6 2:1.7.9-1 ii libxmu6 2:1.1.2-2+b3 ii libxpm4 1:3.5.12-1 ii libxt6 1:1.1.5-1+b3 ii libxxhash0 0.6.5-2 ii libzzip-0-13 0.13.62-3.2+deb10u1 ii perl 5.28.1-6+deb10u1 ii t1utils 1.41-3 ii tex-common 6.11 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-1+deb10u2 Versions of packages texlive-binaries recommends: ii texlive-base 2018.20190227-2 texlive-binaries suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Preuße, Hilmar <hille42@web.de>
- Cc: 1036891-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1036891: texlive-binaries: Error "attempt to call method 'read' (a nil value)" makes lualatex unusable
- From: Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 22:23:45 +0200
- Message-id: <fe13f118dc4d275e2f66445aa9fb6091326f912e.camel@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1448ca5b-f87e-791d-ac6c-975c5d40187b@web.de>
- References: <[🔎] 64BD1390-D21B-49F0-96E3-B7CBB5E58FDE@gmx.fr> <[🔎] d02af4b1-a72c-8c69-c360-69bafc386958@web.de> <[🔎] 64BD1390-D21B-49F0-96E3-B7CBB5E58FDE@gmx.fr> <[🔎] ZHZCYLWgYwfYFt1D@eldamar.lan> <[🔎] ee31b349-f0c3-7060-0ea2-5696f0be8dac@web.de> <[🔎] ZHbUOI0uMfTipUwp@eldamar.lan> <[🔎] 64BD1390-D21B-49F0-96E3-B7CBB5E58FDE@gmx.fr> <[🔎] 05709ff41e269ec3ea298df6765fea4b42c1040a.camel@telus.net> <[🔎] 04d478bd-133b-ee12-4a1c-a741ef974ae8@web.de> <[🔎] 64BD1390-D21B-49F0-96E3-B7CBB5E58FDE@gmx.fr> <[🔎] 4bc9908aa37618fc6dc4def62792d63c34ff23d1.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] 1448ca5b-f87e-791d-ac6c-975c5d40187b@web.de>
Version: 2018.20181218.49446-1+deb10u2 Hi Hilmar, I have just released DLA-3427-2 and incorporated your patch for CVE-2019-18604. I believe this issue has been resolved and I'm going to close this bug report now. Regards, MarkusAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---