[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#722585: marked as done (texlive-binaries: uptex is missing a man page)

Your message dated Sun, 4 Aug 2019 14:16:03 +0200
with message-id <974dd7c6-0b3a-8fa9-9f8a-e0a6c743d84b@web.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#722585: texlive-binaries: uptex is missing a man page
has caused the Debian Bug report #722585,
regarding texlive-binaries: uptex is missing a man page
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
722585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722585
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2012.20120628-4
Severity: minor

The subject says it all. Please consider adding a man page, maybe with
help2man(1).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2018.20181218.49446-1

Am 12.09.2013 um 16:29 teilte Helge Kreutzmann mit:

Hi,

> The subject says it all. Please consider adding a man page, maybe
> with help2man(1).
> 
There is one since buster. Closing.

Hilmar
-- 
sigfault
#206401 http://counter.li.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: