[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#215248: marked as done (tetex-bin: pdftosrc has no manpage and no doc)



Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:19:59 +0100
with message-id <20051101181959.GA3104@preusse>
and subject line Bug#215248: tetex-bin: pdftosrc has no manpage and no doc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2003 14:24:29 +0000
>From martin@piware.de Sat Oct 11 09:24:20 2003
Return-path: <martin@piware.de>
Received: from (SpeedMailer.intranet.fbn-dd.de) [195.227.105.178] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A8KfL-00059X-00; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 09:24:20 -0500
Received: from server1.intranet.fbn-dd.de (192-168-0-1.intranet.fbn-dd.de [192.168.0.1])
	by SpeedMailer.intranet.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F7FAC2C6
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:24:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by server1.intranet.fbn-dd.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h9BELSW30834
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:21:28 +0200
Received: from donald.balu5 (10-28-130-200.intranet-28-130.fbn-dd.de [10.28.130.200])
	by server1.intranet.fbn-dd.de (AvMailGate-2.0.1.1) id 30821-133EC6D8;
	Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:21:21 +0200
Received: from martin by donald.balu5 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A8Kbe-0000Ej-00; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:20:30 +0200
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:20:30 +0200
From: Martin Pitt <martin@piware.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin: pdftosrc has no manpage and no doc
Message-ID: <20031011142025.GA906@donald.balu5>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.34
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Martin Pitt <martin@piware.de>
X-AntiVirus: OK! AntiVir MailGate Version 2.0.1.1; AVE: 6.21.0.1; VDF: 6.21.0.64
	 at server1 has not found any known virus in this email.
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-4.3
Severity: normal

Hi!

The program 'pdftosrc' has an interesting name, but no manpage.
There's no documentation in /usr/share/doc/tetex-bin, it doesn't
accept -h nor --help and google brings to (popular) hits for
'pdftosrc [documentation|man|manpage].

Thanks and have a nice day!

Martin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux donald 2.6.0-test7 #1 Sat Oct 11 00:48:58 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro

Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debconf                    1.3.14        Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils                2.5.5         Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dpkg                       1.10.15       Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  ed                         0.2-20        The classic unix line editor
ii  libc6                      2.3.2-8       GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                    1:3.3.2-0pre5 GCC support library
ii  libkpathsea3               2.0.2-4.3     shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii  libpng12-0                 1.2.5.0-4     PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++5                 1:3.3.2-0pre5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libwww-ssl0 [libwww0]      5.4.0-9       The W3C-WWW library (SSL support)
ii  libxaw7                    4.2.1-12.1    X Athena widget set library
ii  mime-support               3.23-1        MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  perl                       5.8.1-2       Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  t1lib1                     1.3.1-3       Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii  tetex-base                 2.0.2-4.2     Basic library files of teTeX
ii  xlibs                      4.2.1-12.1    X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                     1:1.1.4-15    compression library - runtime

-- debconf information excluded


-- 
Martin Pitt
home:  www.piware.de
eMail: martin@piware.de

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 215248-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 19:00:22 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Tue Nov 01 11:00:22 2005
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EX0kO-0003GZ-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:20:36 -0800
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
	by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #317)
	id 1EX0jt-0000Vs-00
	for 215248-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:20:05 +0100
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:20:00 +0100
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:19:59 +0100
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: 215248-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#215248: tetex-bin: pdftosrc has no manpage and no doc
Message-ID: <20051101181959.GA3104@preusse>
References: <20031011142025.GA906@donald.balu5>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031011142025.GA906@donald.balu5>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 215248-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
	HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On 11.10.03 Martin Pitt (martin@piware.de) wrote:

Hi all,

> The program 'pdftosrc' has an interesting name, but no manpage.
> There's no documentation in /usr/share/doc/tetex-bin, it doesn't
> accept -h nor --help and google brings to (popular) hits for
> 'pdftosrc [documentation|man|manpage].
> 
Sorry for the late response. teTeX 3.0 has been uploaded to unstable
recently. That version does contain the source code of the program,
but the program is not installed any more:

drachi:[hille] >wget http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_3.0-10.1_i386.deb
--18:40:57--
18:42:09 (52.40 KB/s) - `tetex-bin_3.0-10.1_i386.deb' saved [3842642/3842642]
drachi:[hille] >dpkg-deb -c tetex-bin_3.0-10.1_i386.deb | grep pdfto
drachi:[hille] >

Now for further explanation: The idea behind the program was to
include the TeX source code into the pdf file as stream object to be
later able to extract the fully functional file. That can be done
actually using the program pdftk (separate package) and the command
unpack_files. The files can be attached using the package attachfile.

Example:

drachi:[t1] >more aa.tex
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{attachfile}
\begin{document}
\attachfile{\jobname.tex}
test
\end{document}
drachi:[t1] >pdflatex aa.tex
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.14159-1.10b-2.1 (Web2C 7.4.5)
<snip>
Output written on aa.pdf (1 page, 6950 bytes).
Transcript written on aa.log.
drachi:[t1] >ls -l
total 24
-rw-r--r--  1 hille users  391 Nov  1 19:11 aa.aux
-rw-r--r--  1 hille users 6905 Nov  1 19:11 aa.log
-rw-r--r--  1 hille users    0 Nov  1 19:11 aa.out
-rw-r--r--  1 hille users 6950 Nov  1 19:11 aa.pdf
-rw-r--r--  1 hille users  111 Nov  1 18:50 aa.tex
drachi:[t1] >mkdir t2
drachi:[t1] >pdftk aa.pdf unpack_files output t2
drachi:[t1] >diff t2/aa.tex aa.tex

1. I used an very old version of attachfile for demonstration, the
   syntax may have changed.
2. The package attachfile is actually not contained in teTeX. Feel
   free to file a wishlist bug.

Regards,
  Hilmar
-- 
sigmentation fault



Reply to: