Bug#329972: marked as done (Missing initex and virtex)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:11:31 +0200
with message-id <873bnqzjl8.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
and subject line Bug#329972: Missing initex and virtex
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 21:02:51 +0000
>From anton@lml.bas.bg Sat Sep 24 14:02:51 2005
Return-path: <anton@lml.bas.bg>
Received: from lml1.bas.bg (lml.bas.bg) [195.96.224.22]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EJHAY-0005p3-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:02:51 -0700
Received: from ip-205-117.powernet.bg ([85.187.205.117] helo=debian)
by lml.bas.bg with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EJHfB-0003Jd-00; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 00:34:29 +0300
Received: from anton by debian with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EJHDQ-0003fa-8t; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 00:05:48 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Missing initex and virtex
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 00:05:48 +0300
Message-Id: <E1EJHDQ-0003fa-8t@debian>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-7
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi!
The new tetex-bin package doesn't contain soft links for initex and
virtex. Some users will expect them.
Anton Zinoviev
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329972-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 14:11:34 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Tue Sep 27 07:11:34 2005
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from idmailgate1.unizh.ch [130.60.127.100]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKGBB-00026B-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 07:11:34 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([130.60.169.223])
by idmailgate1.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j8REBVWH031955;
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:11:31 +0200
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank)
by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EKGB9-0003Xo-M3; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:11:31 +0200
To: Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg>
Cc: 329972-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#329972: Missing initex and virtex
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <20050927120530.GA8779@debian> (Anton Zinoviev's message of
"Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:05:30 +0300")
References: <E1EJHDQ-0003fa-8t@debian> <87wtl4xamz.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
<20050926200426.GB9539@dbs.uni-hannover.de>
<87u0g6zs8h.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20050927120530.GA8779@debian>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:11:31 +0200
Message-ID: <873bnqzjl8.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: 329972-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:04:46PM +0200, Frank K=FCster wrote:
>> Thomas Esser <te@dbs.uni-hannover.de> wrote:
>>=20
>> > Personally, I don't know a single user who has ever needed one of the
>> > vir* commands. And ini*, is provided by passing -ini, e.g. "tex -ini"
>> > instead of "initex".
>>=20
>> Anton has used that too, meanwhile, as far as I know. Anton, is it okay
>> to close this bug?
>
> For me yes - it is OK, but there are books refering to virtex and
> initex. I think you can decide about this issue better than me.
I think that it is in books is not a particularly strong reason - there
are many more obsolete pieces of information in books, and things harder
to find - closing.
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
Reply to: