[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#493036: Additional Info



On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:51:19PM +0200, Justin Hartman wrote:
> Further to my initial bug report here is the output of apt-get upgrade
> running more detailed reporting:
> 
> apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> The following packages have been kept back:
>   wordpress
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>   apache2 apache2-mpm-prefork apache2-utils apache2.2-common
> debconf-utils initscripts libkrb53 linux-image-2.6.18-6-amd64 locales
> sysv-rc
>   trac
> 11 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> 1 not fully installed or removed.
> Need to get 0B/23.6MB of archives.
> After unpacking 4096B of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> Setting up debconf (1.5.11etch2) ...
> + '[' -z '' ']'
> + '[' configure = configure ']'
> + '[' -n 1.5.11etch1 ']'
> + dpkg --compare-versions 1.5.11etch1 lt 1.1.0
> + . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
> ++ '[' '!' '' ']'
> ++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
> ++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
> ++ '[' '' ']'
> ++ exec /usr/share/debconf/frontend
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/debconf.postinst configure 1.5.11etch1
> + '[' -z 1 ']'
> + . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
> ++ '[' '!' 1 ']'
> ++ '[' -z '' ']'
> ++ exec
> ++ '[' '' ']'
> ++ exec
> ++ DEBCONF_REDIR=1
> ++ export DEBCONF_REDIR
> + '[' configure = configure ']'
> + '[' -n 1.5.11etch1 ']'
> + dpkg --compare-versions 1.5.11etch1 lt 1.3.11
> + PYTHON=python2.4
> + which python2.4
> + '[' -e /usr/lib/python2.4/compileall.py ']'
> + DIRLIST=' /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages'
> + for i in '$DIRLIST'
> + python2.4 /usr/lib/python2.4/compileall.py -q /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages
> Compiling /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Beaker-0.9.4-py2.4.egg/beaker/ext/google.py
> ...
> SyntaxError: ('future feature absolute_import is not defined',)

Hello Justin,
this looks like an instance of bug #479484 against python-beaker.
This bug is supposed to be fixed in version 0.9.5, but you seem
to have 0.9.4. 

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 



Reply to: