Re: replacing misleading debian.org/security claims
max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> wrote on 14/01/2022 at 00:38:44+0100:
> January 10, 2022 6:31:37 AM CET Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> We are going to stop anyway at some point displaying the NVD severity, for context see #992115.
>
> As I see it, Debian should be free to display or not display NVD
> ratings, but it shouldn't display the incorrect "medium" NVD ratings,
> when they are actually much worse, as it's been doing. In fact, I
> think it should issue a public retraction.
>
> Any progress on my original proposal? Are the wheels in motion?
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2021/12/msg00002.html
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2022/01/msg00002.html
>
> I can't help but feel that it's a 15 second job for anyone with write
> access to the site, and the reprehensibility of the current claims
> should be obvious to those with a working moral compass.
Maybe at some time you could just stop keeping on insisting on that
matter?
Regards,
--
PEB
Reply to: