Re: debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge

To: Alexandros Papadopoulos <apapadop@alumni.cmu.edu>
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge
From: Benedikt Hallinger <b.hallinger@skyforcesystems.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:39:24 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 3c509833eebe901cf30a3761bb5341d6@localhost>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] feffd9290710080030r41ac7f4do98931feeae8ab6ac@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] feffd9290710080030r41ac7f4do98931feeae8ab6ac@mail.gmail.com>

> So I believe the above output NOT to be the result of a breach. My
> question is, is it acceptable to have so many important and widely
> used packages in *stable* without MD5 checksums?

Hi, sarge is not stable anymore. Etch went stable as of August 15th.

Reply to:

References:
- debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge
  - From: "Alexandros Papadopoulos" <apapadop@alumni.cmu.edu>

Prev by Date: debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge
Next by Date: Re: debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge
Previous by thread: debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge
Next by thread: Re: debsums: no md5sums for a lot of important packages on sarge
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread