Re: Recent minor vulnerabilities in Apache: status in woody? [SOLVED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
no name supplied wrote:
| On May 27, 2004, at 2:15 PM, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
|
|> On 5/27/2004, Luk Claes wrote:
|>
|>> You should check the website www.d-o/security/nonvulns-woody
|>> At least 4 of the 5 you mention are listed there...
|>
|> Luk -- thank you! Somehow I had no idea that web page existed...
|
|
| Nor did I. It's very good that it's there. However, I am wondering
| what the specific reasons are that Woody is not vulnerable to those
| particular vulnerabilities. Are there pages explaining that? (Maybe
| they should be linked to from that page. [hint hint wink wink])
As mentioned on the page: Common reasons are too old versions in woody
or non-existing packages.
So, I would think the version in woody is too old to be vulnerable.
Cheers
Luk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAwDEi5UTeB5t8Mo0RAkSNAKCX8lPoSG8s3cfPZiVoWDkL3weayACgsMHS
LZgbNmNiXPG7NGWQgXqxwU4=
=bv6V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: