Re: pop mail recommendations
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:12:22AM -0500, mfaurot@atww.org wrote:
> In article <44CF9246-090E-11D7-AB01-0003931D9B5A@tedroby.com> you wrote:
>
> > On Friday, Dec 6, 2002, at 03:18 US/Pacific, Sven Hoexter wrote:
>
> >> I suggest popa3d from http://www.openwall.com but I'm not sure
> >> if you can use it in standalone mode.
>
> > I like the look of popa3d, but it does not support md5 or ssl
> > transport. I know this is trivial protection, but every layer helps.
>
> I'd suggest The University of Washington's POP3 server. Which does
> support SSL. However I don't believe the Debian packages for potato
> included a daemon with SSL support. Not sure about Woody, Sarge or
> Sid though. I just built it from source. You can get the source here:
>
> http://www.washington.edu/imap/
AFAIR the history told us that it's nearly as secure or insecure as
qpopper.
Sven
Reply to: