[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PGP vs. GPG && BAD SIGNATURE



On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 03:34:25AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi Pollywog!
> 
> 
> mutt thinks:
> > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 30 03:33:11 2000) --]
> > gpg: Signature made Sun Apr 30 02:17:24 2000 CEST using DSA key ID 2C447AFC
> > gpg: BAD signature from "Ethan R. Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>"
> > [-- End of PGP output --]
> 
> What might be the reason?

that is interesting, the message that came back to me verified so it
could not be a mail system garbling...  what MUA do you use?  do you
have any procmail recipies that might be tinkering with messages? 

> On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Pollywog wrote:
> 
> > You mean that the patent will expire in September, correct?
> 
> 20th of September yes. party!

we know were far gone when we party over tech patents expiring :P


-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpZuPLGQAOv4.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: