Re: Sagemath: going further: singular
Hello List,
On 08/02/15 14:35, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just deposited singular 4 at Alioth.
and now it in the NEW queue.
Whatever, I have a question about Sage:
at what point, so to speak, Sage may use singular 4 ?
Best wishes,
Jerome
>
> Thanks,
> Jerome
>
> On 01/02/15 21:05, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 01/02/15 20:37, Julien Puydt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been a little busy with sage recently :
>>>
>>> jpuydt@cauchy:~/sage-exp$ wc -l /tmp/ptestlong.log.* 247159
>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.1 91206 /tmp/ptestlong.log.2 21563
>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.3 13453 /tmp/ptestlong.log.4 15762
>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.5 12012 /tmp/ptestlong.log.6 10320
>>> /tmp/ptestlong.log.7 411475 total
>>>
>>> Let me remind you all of this is done by using as many
>>> system-installed packages as possible, in order to see which debian
>>> packages need to be modified and how. Until now, only maxima needs
>>> some love, and we're lacking packages for : libgap, cddlib, rubiks,
>>> sagenb, sagetex, singular and jmol.
>>
>> singular is on its way (without the user documentation to begin with,
>> but at this stage it might not be that important):
>> I have to revisit d/copyright, and then bring to git my ready material.
>>
>> Otherwise, I thought that libgap could be worked around.
>>
>>>
>>> I have attached my current patch ; I'm sorry it is a big contains-all
>>> patch and not a series, but it's easier to work like this for the
>>> moment. I'm exploring uncharted territory, not doing clean packaging.
>>> Yet.
>>>
>>> The src/sage/interfaces/gp.py part has been quite painful to obtain,
>>> but might make Felix cry -- of joy!
>>>
>>> I hope that helps,
>>>
>>> Snark on #debian-science
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Jerome
>>
>>
>
>
Reply to: