[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Lintian check for d/upstream files (Was: another source of URLs for DUCK: debian/upstream)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Am 2013-11-21 16:15, schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi Simon,
Hello!
> 
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 02:56:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>> 
>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 05:09:37PM +0200, Simon Kainz wrote:
>>> Am 2013-08-23 13:39, schrieb Andreas Tille:
>>>>> Otherwise I'd gladly help working on a lintian module.
>>>> I have never written any lintian check so some kind of
>>>> kickstart would be great.
>>>> 
>>> Hi!
>>> 
>>> I wrote a _very basic_ lintian check, available here:
>>> 
>>> http://familiekainz.at/deb/lintian/metadata.tgz
>> 
>> That's very cool!  Thanks for your effort!
> 
> I have found some issue which is not found by the lintian check. 
> Please have a look at
> 
> git://git.debian.org/git/debian-med/r-cran-ggplot2.git

Sorry, i didn't find d/upstream in the repo specified. Are your sure
this is the correct repo?
I simple git clone'd the url above.

Bye,



> 
> which contains an d/upstream file with the line
> 
> 
> Cite-as:<a
> href="http://home.imf.au.dk/jensen/software/gfan/gfan.html";>Gfan, a
> software system for Gröbner fans and tropical varieties</a>
> 
> 
> This is wrong YAML syntax since the separator between key and value
> is
> 
> ": "
> 
> and the space is lacking in the line above.  I might add that in
> the beginning the yaml files were parsed using Perl and later I did
> the parsing with Python and when doing so I detected several
> instances of this syntax issue.  So I assume that the Perl YAML
> implementation is not as strict as it should be here - which leads
> to the consequence that lintian will not detect it.
> 
> I would be very happy if you could inject this check into the
> lintian test.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Andreas.
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=MiCO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: