Hi, On 18-03-03 16:30:36, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > ruby-factory-girl-rails fails to build because of dependency checking > looking for a factory_girl gemspec file instead of a factory_bot. > > I don't know if it is better to fix factory-girl-rails gemspecs, or to > ship also the factor_girl.gemspec file too with ruby-factory-bot. Hm, I'm not really sure how to deal with this, as I already (tried?) to describe in one of my initial mails: Not only to name changed, but also code within, and no "compat helper / level" was introduced. This means, that code which depends on factory_girl needs to change as well. Upstream described the necessary steps regarding this [1]. Given these circumstances, I'm not really sure if using 'Replaces' in d/control and providing a transitional package is the right way to go. What about introducing ruby-factory-bot as a new package without 'Breaks', 'Replaces' and a transitional package, and removing ruby-factory-girl once all upstreams of the reverse dependencies have changed to ruby-factory-bot? FWIW: I could also introduce / prepare ruby-factory-bot-rails, as this was renamed as well. @Pirate: Asking you, because currently you're listed as the only uploader: Would this help, any opinion? Personally, I'm not sure if this is needed at all, given there are no rdepends. Cheers, Georg [1] https://github.com/thoughtbot/factory_bot/blob/4-9-0-stable/UPGRADE_FROM_FACTORY_GIRL.md
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature