Bug#1070321: marked as done (transition: nginx ABI change: nginx-abi-1.24.0-1 -> nginx-abi-1.26.0-1)
Your message dated Wed, 8 May 2024 21:31:36 +0200
with message-id <ZjvTGNAFdjOQLATw@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1070321: transition: nginx ABI change: nginx-abi-1.24.0-1 -> nginx-abi-1.26.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070321,
regarding transition: nginx ABI change: nginx-abi-1.24.0-1 -> nginx-abi-1.26.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1070321: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070321
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: nginx@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:nginx
Hi,
a new version 1.26.0 of nginx has been released.
I have uploaded version 1.26.0-1~exp1 to the experimental and
would like to upload the new nginx 1.26.0-1 version to the unstable.
And with the upload of 1.26.0-1 nginx to unstable,
the nginx ABI version changes at the same time. Previous ABI nginx-abi-1.24.0-1, new ABI nginx-abi-1.26.0-1.
Therefore, we would also need to rebuild all 3rd party nginx modules (libnginx-mod-* packages)
which depends on nginx. Hence the transition request.
Furthermore, this upload/rebuild solves the problem that arises at time_t 64 transition:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069997
Ben file:
title = "nginx";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /nginx-dev/;
is_good = .depends ~ /nginx-abi-1.26.0-1/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /nginx-abi-1.24.0-1/;
Please when the nginx 1.26.0-1 arives to the unstable,
can You schedule binNMUs for the above mentioned packages in unstable on all architectures.
Thanks
Jan
PS: ABI versioning is a relatively new feature in nginx, so this is the first transition request.
And any ideas how to automate the transitions are welcome
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-05-05 18:42:31 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2024-05-03 19:08:58 +0200, Jan Mojzis wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: nginx@packages.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:nginx
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > a new version 1.26.0 of nginx has been released.
> >
> > I have uploaded version 1.26.0-1~exp1 to the experimental and
> > would like to upload the new nginx 1.26.0-1 version to the unstable.
> >
> > And with the upload of 1.26.0-1 nginx to unstable,
> > the nginx ABI version changes at the same time. Previous ABI nginx-abi-1.24.0-1, new ABI nginx-abi-1.26.0-1.
> >
> > Therefore, we would also need to rebuild all 3rd party nginx modules (libnginx-mod-* packages)
> > which depends on nginx. Hence the transition request.
> >
> > Furthermore, this upload/rebuild solves the problem that arises at time_t 64 transition:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069997
>
> Please go ahead.
nginx and the reverse dependencies migrated.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: