Your message dated Sat, 9 Mar 2024 17:07:58 +0100 with message-id <1710000367@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> and subject line Re: transition: libppd has caused the Debian Bug report #1027424, regarding transition: libppd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1027424: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027424 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: libppd
- From: Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 10:06:07 +0100
- Message-id: <1672477397@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: libppd@packages.debian.org, Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter@gmail.com> Control: affects -1 + src:libppd Greetings, possible this is not a regular transition, but in exchange I guess it should be pretty smooth and simple ... So some background: There are major changes coming in the area of printing using CUPS, driven by Till Kamppeter (Cc'd), and among other things this will introduce a library "libppd" to interact with PPD (PostScript Printer Description) files. That one however will clash with an existing libppd, maintained by yours truly, and after some discussion with Till we figured the sane way was to move that old library out of the way, name-wise. So src:libppd has been renamed to src:libppd-legacy, and has entered experimental yesterday. While doing so, I've fixed a longstanding mismatch in the soname version, hence the new number libppd-legacy*1*. Now about the formal transition procedure: There is exactly one reverse build-dependency, src:gpr, I've already filed #1027408 for the required changes. Taking care of this is on my list. That should be all - if you need more information, just let me know. Kind regards, Christoph Ben file: title = "libppd"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libppd0" | .depends ~ "libppd-legacy1"; is_good = .depends ~ "libppd-legacy1"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libppd0";Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 1027424-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: transition: libppd
- From: Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
- Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 17:07:58 +0100
- Message-id: <1710000367@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>
- In-reply-to: <1672477397@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>
- References: <1672477397@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de>
Christoph Biedl wrote... > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: libppd@packages.debian.org, Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter@gmail.com> > Control: affects -1 + src:libppd This was handled in a completely different way, hence there is no need for this transition any longer. Have a nice day. ChristophAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---