Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> 于2024年1月13日周六 11:27写道：
>
> Let me try again, following up on the previous thread, but removing most of the irrelevant history.
>
> If I have a 32-bit Intel system that is currently supported on bookworm (currently running bullseye, but I can upgrade it), is that of use to anyone as a native build platform for 32-bit binary packages for Debian?
>
You are yet another person who is confused by the name "i386" vs "amd64".
AMD64 is just the named due to that X86 is extended to X86-64 by AMD *first*.
It means that "Intel 64" or "EM64T" is almost same with "AMD64".
So, you, the Intel CPU user, should use "AMD64", if you don't clearly
know that your
Intel CPU is 32bit only.
For more clear, for Debian, "AMD64" is equal to X86-64.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
--
YunQiang Su
Reply to: