Your message dated Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:30:12 +0100 with message-id <f36784c8-2a0d-4aec-9cbb-91c557e6ce1b@debian.org> and subject line Re: "No test result" for superficial tests is misleading has caused the Debian Bug report #1011267, regarding "No test result" for superficial tests is misleading to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1011267: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011267 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: "No test result" for superficial tests is misleading
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 12:10:29 +0300
- Message-id: <165295142967.95417.11750006404367406368.reportbug@localhost>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: minor User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney When a package provides only superficial tests, tracker.d.o page shows "No test results" "result" for the autopkgtests. This is misleading, especially since it links to a successful test result, - it looks like autopkgtest infrastructure is broken or the result hasn't been updated yet (like the same page shows "missing build on $arch" while it just built on $arch, - the page just hasn't been updated to reflect the build on this architecture). In order to remove this confusion, the wording for this case should be changed. I'm not a native English speaker, but I do have some suggestions for https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/blob/master/britney2/policies/autopkgtest.py#L61 EXCUSES_LABELS = { "NEUTRAL": '<span style="background:#e5c545">No test results</span>', (and OLD_NEUTRAL too). It might be "Nonconclusive" (or "Inconclusive"), or "Superficial/Skipped" (depending on the reasons why "NEUTRAL" result can happen), or even "Neutral", - instead of "No test results". Thanks, /mjt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 1011267-done@bugs.debian.org, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
- Subject: Re: "No test result" for superficial tests is misleading
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:30:12 +0100
- Message-id: <f36784c8-2a0d-4aec-9cbb-91c557e6ce1b@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <165295142967.95417.11750006404367406368.reportbug@localhost>
- References: <165295142967.95417.11750006404367406368.reportbug@localhost> <165295142967.95417.11750006404367406368.reportbug@localhost>
On Thu, 19 May 2022 12:10:29 +0300 Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote:When a package provides only superficial tests, tracker.d.o page shows "No test results" "result" for the autopkgtests. This is misleading, especially since it links to a successful test result, - it looks like autopkgtest infrastructure is broken or the result hasn't been updated yet (like the same page shows "missing build on $arch" while it just built on $arch, - the page just hasn't been updated to reflect the build on this architecture).I have fixed this some weeks ago, it now says "No tests, superficial or marked flaky"PaulAttachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---