On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 12:40:35PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 07-12-2023 12:20, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > I hope that in several hours, > > > https://release.debian.org/britney/excuses_s-p-u.html will have the answer. awesome, thank you very much! > > it should find packages like jtreg6 that are scheduled for the next > > point release, but it won't find packages like gmp that went into > > bullseye 2 years ago. > Ack. Indeed it spots: > cacti, fastdds, freetype, grub-efi-amd64-signed, grub-efi-arm64-signed, > grub-efi-ia32-signed, jtreg6, llvm-toolchain-16, node-babel7, > node-browserify-sign and slurm-wlm. A bunch of them have arch:all binaries. eeks. > > Stopping further regression on this is good, but for the ~ February > > point releases we have to discuss whether binNMUs+NMUs for packages that > > slipped through in the past should be done for bookworm (and bullseye). > I would agree with this, but I'm not an SRM. A bunch of these are security > uploads. We need to discuss this with the security team too (in CC now). I also agree with this, though I'm also neither an SRM nor a security team member. :) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Because things are the way they are, things will not stay the way they are. (Bertolt Brecht)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature