Bug#971958: marked as done (transition: libpgm)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:41:44 +0200
with message-id <20201018074144.GB6577@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#971958: transition: libpgm
has caused the Debian Bug report #971958,
regarding transition: libpgm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
971958: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971958
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi RMs,
I'm asking for a small transition of libpgm. Two packages are
affected, libxs and zeromq3. The latter builds fine with libpgm 5.3 in
experimental.
The question is libxs because while I submitted a patch [1] that fixes
its FTBFS with libpgm 5.3, it seems to be a dead weight. The upstream
of it [2] disappeared. Popcon shows nine users and its maintainer
didn't update it for four and half years (ie Standards-Version is
still 3.9.7, debhelper level is 9).
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/971957
[2] https://github.com/crossroads-io/libxs
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2020-10-10 17:37:57, László Böszörményi wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi RMs,
>
> I'm asking for a small transition of libpgm. Two packages are
> affected, libxs and zeromq3. The latter builds fine with libpgm 5.3 in
> experimental.
libpgm | 5.3.128~dfsg-2 | testing | source
Cheers
> The question is libxs because while I submitted a patch [1] that fixes
> its FTBFS with libpgm 5.3, it seems to be a dead weight. The upstream
> of it [2] disappeared. Popcon shows nine users and its maintainer
> didn't update it for four and half years (ie Standards-Version is
> still 3.9.7, debhelper level is 9).
>
> Thanks,
> Laszlo/GCS
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/971957
> [2] https://github.com/crossroads-io/libxs
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: