Re: Bug#847575: closed by Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org> (no embedded dietlibc)
On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 16:13 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 07:56:36PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Thankfully none of that worked. I say thankfully, because you'd have
> > given release.d.o an allegedly RC bug (it may be RC for e2fsprogs, it's
> > certainly not so for release.d.o) and removed the original bug from
> > where it belongs. (The binNMU doesn't resolve the fact that the original
> > issue existed - and for some versions still exists - in e2fsprogs.)
>
> It only exists in the versions of e2fsprogs shipping in Jessie and
> before. So unless the SRM's think that it's worth it to fix this
> issue via a change to e2fsprogs going to proposed-updates for Jessie
> (I'm not entirely convinced but if you want me to add the Built-Using
> and ask for a update to Jessie stable, I can do that, and we can punt
> on the binNMU for e2fsck-static since it will be obsoleted by the fix
> of e2fsprogs in Debian stable.)
I already scheduled the binNMUs for the handful of architectures that I
could, in the cloned #849488. You may wish to check the architecture
list there and confirm whether any of the others were typoes or if the
three architectures mentioned are sufficient.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: